MSVSphere Packaging Team
3 months ago
parent
60f7b33637
commit
b9993a8a60
@ -0,0 +1,145 @@
|
||||
From 52a9ee6556a0467f5134fb6392ff1681a38f3252 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
|
||||
From: Pierre Rogier <progier@redhat.com>
|
||||
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2024 13:27:10 +0200
|
||||
Subject: [PATCH] CVE-2024-5953
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
.../tests/suites/password/regression_test.py | 51 ++++++++++++++++++-
|
||||
ldap/servers/plugins/pwdstorage/md5_pwd.c | 9 +++-
|
||||
ldap/servers/plugins/pwdstorage/pbkdf2_pwd.c | 6 +++
|
||||
3 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
|
||||
|
||||
diff --git a/dirsrvtests/tests/suites/password/regression_test.py b/dirsrvtests/tests/suites/password/regression_test.py
|
||||
index 4876ff435..160d6f01d 100644
|
||||
--- a/dirsrvtests/tests/suites/password/regression_test.py
|
||||
+++ b/dirsrvtests/tests/suites/password/regression_test.py
|
||||
@@ -8,11 +8,12 @@
|
||||
import pytest
|
||||
import time
|
||||
import glob
|
||||
+import base64
|
||||
from lib389._constants import PASSWORD, DN_DM, DEFAULT_SUFFIX
|
||||
from lib389._constants import SUFFIX, PASSWORD, DN_DM, DN_CONFIG, PLUGIN_RETRO_CHANGELOG, DEFAULT_SUFFIX, DEFAULT_CHANGELOG_DB, DEFAULT_BENAME
|
||||
from lib389 import Entry
|
||||
from lib389.topologies import topology_m1 as topo_supplier
|
||||
-from lib389.idm.user import UserAccounts
|
||||
+from lib389.idm.user import UserAccounts, UserAccount
|
||||
from lib389.utils import ldap, os, logging, ensure_bytes, ds_is_newer, ds_supports_new_changelog
|
||||
from lib389.topologies import topology_st as topo
|
||||
from lib389.idm.organizationalunit import OrganizationalUnits
|
||||
@@ -40,6 +41,13 @@ TEST_PASSWORDS += ['CNpwtest1ZZZZ', 'ZZZZZCNpwtest1',
|
||||
TEST_PASSWORDS2 = (
|
||||
'CN12pwtest31', 'SN3pwtest231', 'UID1pwtest123', 'MAIL2pwtest12@redhat.com', '2GN1pwtest123', 'People123')
|
||||
|
||||
+SUPPORTED_SCHEMES = (
|
||||
+ "{SHA}", "{SSHA}", "{SHA256}", "{SSHA256}",
|
||||
+ "{SHA384}", "{SSHA384}", "{SHA512}", "{SSHA512}",
|
||||
+ "{crypt}", "{NS-MTA-MD5}", "{clear}", "{MD5}",
|
||||
+ "{SMD5}", "{PBKDF2_SHA256}", "{PBKDF2_SHA512}",
|
||||
+ "{GOST_YESCRYPT}", "{PBKDF2-SHA256}", "{PBKDF2-SHA512}" )
|
||||
+
|
||||
def _check_unhashed_userpw(inst, user_dn, is_present=False):
|
||||
"""Check if unhashed#user#password attribute is present or not in the changelog"""
|
||||
unhashed_pwd_attribute = 'unhashed#user#password'
|
||||
@@ -319,6 +327,47 @@ def test_unhashed_pw_switch(topo_supplier):
|
||||
# Add debugging steps(if any)...
|
||||
pass
|
||||
|
||||
+@pytest.mark.parametrize("scheme", SUPPORTED_SCHEMES )
|
||||
+def test_long_hashed_password(topo, create_user, scheme):
|
||||
+ """Check that hashed password with very long value does not cause trouble
|
||||
+
|
||||
+ :id: 252a1f76-114b-11ef-8a7a-482ae39447e5
|
||||
+ :setup: standalone Instance
|
||||
+ :parametrized: yes
|
||||
+ :steps:
|
||||
+ 1. Add a test user user
|
||||
+ 2. Set a long password with requested scheme
|
||||
+ 3. Bind on that user using a wrong password
|
||||
+ 4. Check that instance is still alive
|
||||
+ 5. Remove the added user
|
||||
+ :expectedresults:
|
||||
+ 1. Success
|
||||
+ 2. Success
|
||||
+ 3. Should get ldap.INVALID_CREDENTIALS exception
|
||||
+ 4. Success
|
||||
+ 5. Success
|
||||
+ """
|
||||
+ inst = topo.standalone
|
||||
+ inst.simple_bind_s(DN_DM, PASSWORD)
|
||||
+ users = UserAccounts(inst, DEFAULT_SUFFIX)
|
||||
+ # Make sure that server is started as this test may crash it
|
||||
+ inst.start()
|
||||
+ # Adding Test user (It may already exists if previous test failed)
|
||||
+ user2 = UserAccount(inst, dn='uid=test_user_1002,ou=People,dc=example,dc=com')
|
||||
+ if not user2.exists():
|
||||
+ user2 = users.create_test_user(uid=1002, gid=2002)
|
||||
+ # Setting hashed password
|
||||
+ passwd = 'A'*4000
|
||||
+ hashed_passwd = scheme.encode('utf-8') + base64.b64encode(passwd.encode('utf-8'))
|
||||
+ user2.replace('userpassword', hashed_passwd)
|
||||
+ # Bind on that user using a wrong password
|
||||
+ with pytest.raises(ldap.INVALID_CREDENTIALS):
|
||||
+ conn = user2.bind(PASSWORD)
|
||||
+ # Check that instance is still alive
|
||||
+ assert inst.status()
|
||||
+ # Remove the added user
|
||||
+ user2.delete()
|
||||
+
|
||||
|
||||
if __name__ == '__main__':
|
||||
# Run isolated
|
||||
diff --git a/ldap/servers/plugins/pwdstorage/md5_pwd.c b/ldap/servers/plugins/pwdstorage/md5_pwd.c
|
||||
index 1e2cf58e7..b9a48d5ca 100644
|
||||
--- a/ldap/servers/plugins/pwdstorage/md5_pwd.c
|
||||
+++ b/ldap/servers/plugins/pwdstorage/md5_pwd.c
|
||||
@@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ md5_pw_cmp(const char *userpwd, const char *dbpwd)
|
||||
unsigned char hash_out[MD5_HASH_LEN];
|
||||
unsigned char b2a_out[MD5_HASH_LEN * 2]; /* conservative */
|
||||
SECItem binary_item;
|
||||
+ size_t dbpwd_len = strlen(dbpwd);
|
||||
|
||||
ctx = PK11_CreateDigestContext(SEC_OID_MD5);
|
||||
if (ctx == NULL) {
|
||||
@@ -45,6 +46,12 @@ md5_pw_cmp(const char *userpwd, const char *dbpwd)
|
||||
goto loser;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
+ if (dbpwd_len >= sizeof b2a_out) {
|
||||
+ slapi_log_err(SLAPI_LOG_PLUGIN, MD5_SUBSYSTEM_NAME,
|
||||
+ "The hashed password stored in the user entry is longer than any valid md5 hash");
|
||||
+ goto loser;
|
||||
+ }
|
||||
+
|
||||
/* create the hash */
|
||||
PK11_DigestBegin(ctx);
|
||||
PK11_DigestOp(ctx, (const unsigned char *)userpwd, strlen(userpwd));
|
||||
@@ -57,7 +64,7 @@ md5_pw_cmp(const char *userpwd, const char *dbpwd)
|
||||
bver = NSSBase64_EncodeItem(NULL, (char *)b2a_out, sizeof b2a_out, &binary_item);
|
||||
/* bver points to b2a_out upon success */
|
||||
if (bver) {
|
||||
- rc = slapi_ct_memcmp(bver, dbpwd, strlen(dbpwd));
|
||||
+ rc = slapi_ct_memcmp(bver, dbpwd, dbpwd_len);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
slapi_log_err(SLAPI_LOG_PLUGIN, MD5_SUBSYSTEM_NAME,
|
||||
"Could not base64 encode hashed value for password compare");
|
||||
diff --git a/ldap/servers/plugins/pwdstorage/pbkdf2_pwd.c b/ldap/servers/plugins/pwdstorage/pbkdf2_pwd.c
|
||||
index dcac4fcdd..82b8c9501 100644
|
||||
--- a/ldap/servers/plugins/pwdstorage/pbkdf2_pwd.c
|
||||
+++ b/ldap/servers/plugins/pwdstorage/pbkdf2_pwd.c
|
||||
@@ -255,6 +255,12 @@ pbkdf2_sha256_pw_cmp(const char *userpwd, const char *dbpwd)
|
||||
passItem.data = (unsigned char *)userpwd;
|
||||
passItem.len = strlen(userpwd);
|
||||
|
||||
+ if (pwdstorage_base64_decode_len(dbpwd, dbpwd_len) > sizeof dbhash) {
|
||||
+ /* Hashed value is too long and cannot match any value generated by pbkdf2_sha256_hash */
|
||||
+ slapi_log_err(SLAPI_LOG_ERR, (char *)schemeName, "Unable to base64 decode dbpwd value. (hashed value is too long)\n");
|
||||
+ return result;
|
||||
+ }
|
||||
+
|
||||
/* Decode the DBpwd to bytes from b64 */
|
||||
if (PL_Base64Decode(dbpwd, dbpwd_len, dbhash) == NULL) {
|
||||
slapi_log_err(SLAPI_LOG_ERR, (char *)schemeName, "Unable to base64 decode dbpwd value\n");
|
||||
--
|
||||
2.44.0
|
||||
|
||||
@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
|
||||
From 323f74c69f84a8482413ecd73cf61d09cfc4a0a1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
|
||||
From: Thierry Bordaz <tbordaz@redhat.com>
|
||||
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2024 15:51:28 +0200
|
||||
Subject: [PATCH] CVE-2024-6237
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
ldap/servers/plugins/syntaxes/inchain.c | 2 +-
|
||||
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
|
||||
|
||||
diff --git a/ldap/servers/plugins/syntaxes/inchain.c b/ldap/servers/plugins/syntaxes/inchain.c
|
||||
index df19c973b..0a6a04e9f 100644
|
||||
--- a/ldap/servers/plugins/syntaxes/inchain.c
|
||||
+++ b/ldap/servers/plugins/syntaxes/inchain.c
|
||||
@@ -277,7 +277,7 @@ inchain_values2keys(Slapi_PBlock *pb, Slapi_Value **vals, Slapi_Value ***ivals,
|
||||
slapi_pblock_get(pb, SLAPI_SEARCH_TARGET_SDN, &base_sdn);
|
||||
|
||||
if (! slapi_attr_is_dn_syntax_type(mrTYPE)) {
|
||||
- slapi_log_err(SLAPI_LOG_ERR, "inchain", "Requires distinguishedName syntax. AttributeDescription %s is not distinguishedName\n");
|
||||
+ slapi_log_err(SLAPI_LOG_ERR, "inchain", "Requires distinguishedName syntax. AttributeDescription %s is not distinguishedName\n", mrTYPE);
|
||||
result = (Slapi_Value **)slapi_ch_calloc(1, sizeof(Slapi_Value *));
|
||||
*ivals = result;
|
||||
return(0);
|
||||
--
|
||||
2.44.0
|
||||
|
||||
@ -0,0 +1,192 @@
|
||||
From 9501c34df01e35f483201a4bba12a93091b2b13f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
|
||||
From: progier389 <progier@redhat.com>
|
||||
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2024 15:17:36 +0200
|
||||
Subject: [PATCH] Issue 5772 - ONE LEVEL search fails to return sub-suffixes
|
||||
(#6219)
|
||||
|
||||
Problem: ONE LEVEL scoped search fails to return sub-suffixes entries
|
||||
Reason: When such search is done, a one level search is done on the main suffix and base search are done on any matching sub-suffix. But main suffix is processed search (to ensure that parent entries are returned before children ones when searching subtree) and ldbm_back_search change the filter to (&(parentid=xxx)old_filter) so the filter test reject the entry on the sub-suffixes.
|
||||
Solution: Revert the backend list when doing one level search so that the sub-suffixes are processed first
|
||||
and restore the base dn for the main suffix.
|
||||
Alternative rejected: reset the filter when discivering a sub-suffix. Not so easy because filter is altered by the rewriteres.
|
||||
And systematic duplication is an useless overhead if there is no matching sub-suffixes (which is the usual case)
|
||||
|
||||
Issue: #5772
|
||||
|
||||
Reviewed by: @tbordaz, @droideck (Thanks!)
|
||||
|
||||
(cherry picked from commit 407bdaa00d1da9f5ff53d66a2e012b17ad658907)
|
||||
---
|
||||
.../suites/mapping_tree/regression_test.py | 36 +++++++++++++++++-
|
||||
ldap/servers/slapd/filterentry.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++-
|
||||
ldap/servers/slapd/opshared.c | 22 ++++++++++-
|
||||
3 files changed, 92 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
|
||||
|
||||
diff --git a/dirsrvtests/tests/suites/mapping_tree/regression_test.py b/dirsrvtests/tests/suites/mapping_tree/regression_test.py
|
||||
index f4877da2b..c3fc2c0a2 100644
|
||||
--- a/dirsrvtests/tests/suites/mapping_tree/regression_test.py
|
||||
+++ b/dirsrvtests/tests/suites/mapping_tree/regression_test.py
|
||||
@@ -92,7 +92,6 @@ EXPECTED_ENTRIES = (("dc=parent", 39), ("dc=child1,dc=parent", 13), ("dc=child2,
|
||||
@pytest.mark.skipif(not has_orphan_attribute, reason = "compatibility attribute not yet implemented in this version")
|
||||
def test_sub_suffixes(topo, orphan_param):
|
||||
""" check the entries found on suffix/sub-suffix
|
||||
- used int
|
||||
|
||||
:id: 5b4421c2-d851-11ec-a760-482ae39447e5
|
||||
:feature: mapping-tree
|
||||
@@ -122,8 +121,41 @@ def test_sub_suffixes(topo, orphan_param):
|
||||
log.info(f'Verifying domain component entries count for search under {suffix} ...')
|
||||
entries = topo.standalone.search_s(suffix, ldap.SCOPE_SUBTREE, "(dc=*)")
|
||||
assert len(entries) == expected
|
||||
- log.info('Found {expected} domain component entries as expected while searching {suffix}')
|
||||
+ log.info(f'Found {expected} domain component entries as expected while searching {suffix}')
|
||||
|
||||
log.info('Test PASSED')
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
+def test_one_level_search_on_sub_suffixes(topo):
|
||||
+ """ Perform one level scoped search accross suffix and sub-suffix
|
||||
+
|
||||
+ :id: 92f3139e-280e-11ef-a989-482ae39447e5
|
||||
+ :feature: mapping-tree
|
||||
+ :setup: Standalone instance with 3 additional backends:
|
||||
+ dc=parent, dc=child1,dc=parent, dc=childr21,dc=parent
|
||||
+ :steps:
|
||||
+ 1. Perform a ONE LEVEL search on dc=parent
|
||||
+ 2. Check that all expected entries have been returned
|
||||
+ 3. Check that only the expected entries have been returned
|
||||
+ :expectedresults:
|
||||
+ 1. Success
|
||||
+ 2. each expected dn should be in the result set
|
||||
+ 3. Number of returned entries should be the same as the number of expected entries
|
||||
+ """
|
||||
+ expected_dns = ( 'dc=child1,dc=parent',
|
||||
+ 'dc=child2,dc=parent',
|
||||
+ 'ou=accounting,dc=parent',
|
||||
+ 'ou=product development,dc=parent',
|
||||
+ 'ou=product testing,dc=parent',
|
||||
+ 'ou=human resources,dc=parent',
|
||||
+ 'ou=payroll,dc=parent',
|
||||
+ 'ou=people,dc=parent',
|
||||
+ 'ou=groups,dc=parent', )
|
||||
+ entries = topo.standalone.search_s("dc=parent", ldap.SCOPE_ONELEVEL, "(objectClass=*)",
|
||||
+ attrlist=("dc","ou"), escapehatch='i am sure')
|
||||
+ log.info(f'one level search on dc=parent returned the following entries: {entries}')
|
||||
+ dns = [ entry.dn for entry in entries ]
|
||||
+ for dn in expected_dns:
|
||||
+ assert dn in dns
|
||||
+ assert len(entries) == len(expected_dns)
|
||||
+
|
||||
diff --git a/ldap/servers/slapd/filterentry.c b/ldap/servers/slapd/filterentry.c
|
||||
index 4de4aa66e..d2c7e3082 100644
|
||||
--- a/ldap/servers/slapd/filterentry.c
|
||||
+++ b/ldap/servers/slapd/filterentry.c
|
||||
@@ -240,6 +240,36 @@ slapi_filter_test_ext(
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
+static const char *
|
||||
+filter_type_as_string(int filter_type)
|
||||
+{
|
||||
+ switch (filter_type) {
|
||||
+ case LDAP_FILTER_AND:
|
||||
+ return "&";
|
||||
+ case LDAP_FILTER_OR:
|
||||
+ return "|";
|
||||
+ case LDAP_FILTER_NOT:
|
||||
+ return "!";
|
||||
+ case LDAP_FILTER_EQUALITY:
|
||||
+ return "=";
|
||||
+ case LDAP_FILTER_SUBSTRINGS:
|
||||
+ return "*";
|
||||
+ case LDAP_FILTER_GE:
|
||||
+ return ">=";
|
||||
+ case LDAP_FILTER_LE:
|
||||
+ return "<=";
|
||||
+ case LDAP_FILTER_PRESENT:
|
||||
+ return "=*";
|
||||
+ case LDAP_FILTER_APPROX:
|
||||
+ return "~";
|
||||
+ case LDAP_FILTER_EXT:
|
||||
+ return "EXT";
|
||||
+ default:
|
||||
+ return "?";
|
||||
+ }
|
||||
+}
|
||||
+
|
||||
+
|
||||
int
|
||||
test_ava_filter(
|
||||
Slapi_PBlock *pb,
|
||||
@@ -253,7 +283,13 @@ test_ava_filter(
|
||||
{
|
||||
int rc;
|
||||
|
||||
- slapi_log_err(SLAPI_LOG_FILTER, "test_ava_filter", "=>\n");
|
||||
+ if (slapi_is_loglevel_set(SLAPI_LOG_FILTER)) {
|
||||
+ char *val = slapi_berval_get_string_copy(&ava->ava_value);
|
||||
+ char buf[BUFSIZ];
|
||||
+ slapi_log_err(SLAPI_LOG_FILTER, "test_ava_filter", "=> AVA: %s%s%s\n",
|
||||
+ ava->ava_type, filter_type_as_string(ftype), escape_string(val, buf));
|
||||
+ slapi_ch_free_string(&val);
|
||||
+ }
|
||||
|
||||
*access_check_done = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
diff --git a/ldap/servers/slapd/opshared.c b/ldap/servers/slapd/opshared.c
|
||||
index f77043afa..540597f45 100644
|
||||
--- a/ldap/servers/slapd/opshared.c
|
||||
+++ b/ldap/servers/slapd/opshared.c
|
||||
@@ -219,6 +219,7 @@ cache_return_target_entry(Slapi_PBlock *pb, Slapi_Backend *be, Slapi_Operation *
|
||||
operation_set_target_entry_id(operation, 0);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
+
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Returns: 0 - if the operation is successful
|
||||
* < 0 - if operation fails.
|
||||
@@ -481,6 +482,20 @@ op_shared_search(Slapi_PBlock *pb, int send_result)
|
||||
while (be_list[index] && be_list[index + 1]) {
|
||||
index++;
|
||||
}
|
||||
+ if (scope == LDAP_SCOPE_ONELEVEL) {
|
||||
+ /*
|
||||
+ * ONE LEVEL searches may ends up on multiple backends
|
||||
+ * with a ONE LEVEL search on a suffix and a BASE search on its
|
||||
+ * subsuffixes. Because LDAP_SCOPE_ONELEVEL rewrite the filter
|
||||
+ * the backends should be reversed so that the BASE search(es)
|
||||
+ * are done first (with the original filter).
|
||||
+ */
|
||||
+ for (int idx = 0; idx <= index/2; idx++) {
|
||||
+ be = be_list[index-idx];
|
||||
+ be_list[index-idx] = be_list[idx];
|
||||
+ be_list[idx] = be;
|
||||
+ }
|
||||
+ }
|
||||
be = be_list[index];
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
be = NULL;
|
||||
@@ -779,7 +794,6 @@ op_shared_search(Slapi_PBlock *pb, int send_result)
|
||||
(slapi_sdn_get_ndn_len(basesdn) == 0)) {
|
||||
int tmp_scope = LDAP_SCOPE_BASE;
|
||||
slapi_pblock_set(pb, SLAPI_SEARCH_SCOPE, &tmp_scope);
|
||||
-
|
||||
if (free_sdn) {
|
||||
slapi_pblock_get(pb, SLAPI_SEARCH_TARGET_SDN, &sdn);
|
||||
slapi_sdn_free(&sdn);
|
||||
@@ -790,6 +804,12 @@ op_shared_search(Slapi_PBlock *pb, int send_result)
|
||||
} else if (slapi_sdn_issuffix(basesdn, be_suffix)) {
|
||||
int tmp_scope = LDAP_SCOPE_ONELEVEL;
|
||||
slapi_pblock_set(pb, SLAPI_SEARCH_SCOPE, &tmp_scope);
|
||||
+ if (free_sdn) {
|
||||
+ slapi_pblock_get(pb, SLAPI_SEARCH_TARGET_SDN, &sdn);
|
||||
+ slapi_sdn_free(&sdn);
|
||||
+ sdn = slapi_sdn_dup(basesdn);
|
||||
+ slapi_pblock_set(pb, SLAPI_SEARCH_TARGET_SDN, (void *)sdn);
|
||||
+ }
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
slapi_sdn_done(&monitorsdn);
|
||||
goto next_be;
|
||||
--
|
||||
2.45.2
|
||||
|
||||
@ -0,0 +1,220 @@
|
||||
From 45e14d64c47080951d9bfa3bcfe8c267d01ce251 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
|
||||
From: tbordaz <tbordaz@redhat.com>
|
||||
Date: Wed, 22 May 2024 11:29:05 +0200
|
||||
Subject: [PATCH] Issue 6172 - RFE: improve the performance of evaluation of
|
||||
filter component when tested against a large valueset (like group members)
|
||||
(#6173)
|
||||
|
||||
Bug description:
|
||||
Before returning an entry (to a SRCH) the server checks that the entry matches the SRCH filter.
|
||||
If a filter component (equality) is testing the value (ava) against a
|
||||
large valueset (like uniquemember values), it takes a long time because
|
||||
of the large number of values and required normalization of the values.
|
||||
This can be improved taking benefit of sorted valueset. Those sorted
|
||||
valueset were created to improve updates of large valueset (groups) but
|
||||
at that time not implemented in SRCH path.
|
||||
|
||||
Fix description:
|
||||
In case of LDAP_FILTER_EQUALITY component, the server can get
|
||||
benefit of the sorted valuearray.
|
||||
To limit the risk of regression, we use the sorted valuearray
|
||||
only for the DN syntax attribute. Indeed the sorted valuearray was
|
||||
designed for those type of attribute.
|
||||
With those two limitations, there is no need of a toggle and
|
||||
the call to plugin_call_syntax_filter_ava can be replaced by
|
||||
a call to slapi_valueset_find.
|
||||
In both cases, sorted valueset and plugin_call_syntax_filter_ava, ava and
|
||||
values are normalized.
|
||||
In sorted valueset, the values have been normalized to insert the index
|
||||
in the sorted array and then comparison is done on normalized values.
|
||||
In plugin_call_syntax_filter_ava, all values in valuearray (of valueset) are normalized
|
||||
before comparison.
|
||||
|
||||
relates: #6172
|
||||
|
||||
Reviewed by: Pierre Rogier, Simon Pichugin (Big Thanks !!!)
|
||||
---
|
||||
.../tests/suites/filter/filter_test.py | 125 ++++++++++++++++++
|
||||
ldap/servers/slapd/filterentry.c | 22 ++-
|
||||
2 files changed, 146 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
|
||||
|
||||
diff --git a/dirsrvtests/tests/suites/filter/filter_test.py b/dirsrvtests/tests/suites/filter/filter_test.py
|
||||
index d6bfa5a3b..4baaf04a7 100644
|
||||
--- a/dirsrvtests/tests/suites/filter/filter_test.py
|
||||
+++ b/dirsrvtests/tests/suites/filter/filter_test.py
|
||||
@@ -9,7 +9,11 @@
|
||||
import logging
|
||||
|
||||
import pytest
|
||||
+import time
|
||||
+from lib389.dirsrv_log import DirsrvAccessLog
|
||||
from lib389.tasks import *
|
||||
+from lib389.backend import Backends, Backend
|
||||
+from lib389.dbgen import dbgen_users, dbgen_groups
|
||||
from lib389.topologies import topology_st
|
||||
from lib389._constants import PASSWORD, DEFAULT_SUFFIX, DN_DM, SUFFIX
|
||||
from lib389.utils import *
|
||||
@@ -304,6 +308,127 @@ def test_extended_search(topology_st):
|
||||
ents = topology_st.standalone.search_s(SUFFIX, ldap.SCOPE_SUBTREE, myfilter)
|
||||
assert len(ents) == 1
|
||||
|
||||
+def test_match_large_valueset(topology_st):
|
||||
+ """Test that when returning a big number of entries
|
||||
+ and that we need to match the filter from a large valueset
|
||||
+ we get benefit to use the sorted valueset
|
||||
+
|
||||
+ :id: 7db5aa88-50e0-4c31-85dd-1d2072cb674c
|
||||
+
|
||||
+ :setup: Standalone instance
|
||||
+
|
||||
+ :steps:
|
||||
+ 1. Create a users and groups backends and tune them
|
||||
+ 2. Generate a test ldif (2k users and 1K groups with all users)
|
||||
+ 3. Import test ldif file using Offline import (ldif2db).
|
||||
+ 4. Prim the 'groups' entrycache with a "fast" search
|
||||
+ 5. Search the 'groups' with a difficult matching value
|
||||
+ 6. check that etime from step 5 is less than a second
|
||||
+
|
||||
+ :expectedresults:
|
||||
+ 1. Create a users and groups backends should PASS
|
||||
+ 2. Generate LDIF should PASS.
|
||||
+ 3. Offline import should PASS.
|
||||
+ 4. Priming should PASS.
|
||||
+ 5. Performance search should PASS.
|
||||
+ 6. Etime of performance search should PASS.
|
||||
+ """
|
||||
+
|
||||
+ log.info('Running test_match_large_valueset...')
|
||||
+ #
|
||||
+ # Test online/offline LDIF imports
|
||||
+ #
|
||||
+ inst = topology_st.standalone
|
||||
+ inst.start()
|
||||
+ backends = Backends(inst)
|
||||
+ users_suffix = "ou=users,%s" % DEFAULT_SUFFIX
|
||||
+ users_backend = 'users'
|
||||
+ users_ldif = 'users_import.ldif'
|
||||
+ groups_suffix = "ou=groups,%s" % DEFAULT_SUFFIX
|
||||
+ groups_backend = 'groups'
|
||||
+ groups_ldif = 'groups_import.ldif'
|
||||
+ groups_entrycache = '200000000'
|
||||
+ users_number = 2000
|
||||
+ groups_number = 1000
|
||||
+
|
||||
+
|
||||
+ # For priming the cache we just want to be fast
|
||||
+ # taking the first value in the valueset is good
|
||||
+ # whether the valueset is sorted or not
|
||||
+ priming_user_rdn = "user0001"
|
||||
+
|
||||
+ # For performance testing, this is important to use
|
||||
+ # user1000 rather then user0001
|
||||
+ # Because user0001 is the first value in the valueset
|
||||
+ # whether we use the sorted valuearray or non sorted
|
||||
+ # valuearray the performance will be similar.
|
||||
+ # With middle value user1000, the performance boost of
|
||||
+ # the sorted valuearray will make the difference.
|
||||
+ perf_user_rdn = "user1000"
|
||||
+
|
||||
+ # Step 1. Prepare the backends and tune the groups entrycache
|
||||
+ try:
|
||||
+ be_users = backends.create(properties={'parent': DEFAULT_SUFFIX, 'nsslapd-suffix': users_suffix, 'name': users_backend})
|
||||
+ be_groups = backends.create(properties={'parent': DEFAULT_SUFFIX, 'nsslapd-suffix': groups_suffix, 'name': groups_backend})
|
||||
+
|
||||
+ # set the entry cache to 200Mb as the 1K groups of 2K users require at least 170Mb
|
||||
+ be_groups.replace('nsslapd-cachememsize', groups_entrycache)
|
||||
+ except:
|
||||
+ raise
|
||||
+
|
||||
+ # Step 2. Generate a test ldif (10k users entries)
|
||||
+ log.info("Generating users LDIF...")
|
||||
+ ldif_dir = inst.get_ldif_dir()
|
||||
+ users_import_ldif = "%s/%s" % (ldif_dir, users_ldif)
|
||||
+ groups_import_ldif = "%s/%s" % (ldif_dir, groups_ldif)
|
||||
+ dbgen_users(inst, users_number, users_import_ldif, suffix=users_suffix, generic=True, parent=users_suffix)
|
||||
+
|
||||
+ # Generate a test ldif (800 groups with 10k members) that fit in 700Mb entry cache
|
||||
+ props = {
|
||||
+ "name": "group",
|
||||
+ "suffix": groups_suffix,
|
||||
+ "parent": groups_suffix,
|
||||
+ "number": groups_number,
|
||||
+ "numMembers": users_number,
|
||||
+ "createMembers": False,
|
||||
+ "memberParent": users_suffix,
|
||||
+ "membershipAttr": "uniquemember",
|
||||
+ }
|
||||
+ dbgen_groups(inst, groups_import_ldif, props)
|
||||
+
|
||||
+ # Step 3. Do the both offline imports
|
||||
+ inst.stop()
|
||||
+ if not inst.ldif2db(users_backend, None, None, None, users_import_ldif):
|
||||
+ log.fatal('test_basic_import_export: Offline users import failed')
|
||||
+ assert False
|
||||
+ if not inst.ldif2db(groups_backend, None, None, None, groups_import_ldif):
|
||||
+ log.fatal('test_basic_import_export: Offline groups import failed')
|
||||
+ assert False
|
||||
+ inst.start()
|
||||
+
|
||||
+ # Step 4. first prime the cache
|
||||
+ # Just request the 'DN'. We are interested by the time of matching not by the time of transfert
|
||||
+ entries = topology_st.standalone.search_s(groups_suffix, ldap.SCOPE_SUBTREE, "(&(objectclass=groupOfUniqueNames)(uniquemember=uid=%s,%s))" % (priming_user_rdn, users_suffix), ['dn'])
|
||||
+ assert len(entries) == groups_number
|
||||
+
|
||||
+ # Step 5. Now do the real performance checking it should take less than a second
|
||||
+ # Just request the 'DN'. We are interested by the time of matching not by the time of transfert
|
||||
+ search_start = time.time()
|
||||
+ entries = topology_st.standalone.search_s(groups_suffix, ldap.SCOPE_SUBTREE, "(&(objectclass=groupOfUniqueNames)(uniquemember=uid=%s,%s))" % (perf_user_rdn, users_suffix), ['dn'])
|
||||
+ duration = time.time() - search_start
|
||||
+ log.info("Duration of the search was %f", duration)
|
||||
+
|
||||
+ # Step 6. Gather the etime from the access log
|
||||
+ inst.stop()
|
||||
+ access_log = DirsrvAccessLog(inst)
|
||||
+ search_result = access_log.match(".*RESULT err=0 tag=101 nentries=%s.*" % groups_number)
|
||||
+ log.info("Found patterns are %s", search_result[0])
|
||||
+ log.info("Found patterns are %s", search_result[1])
|
||||
+ etime = float(search_result[1].split('etime=')[1])
|
||||
+ log.info("Duration of the search from access log was %f", etime)
|
||||
+ assert len(entries) == groups_number
|
||||
+ assert (etime < 1)
|
||||
+
|
||||
if __name__ == '__main__':
|
||||
# Run isolated
|
||||
# -s for DEBUG mode
|
||||
diff --git a/ldap/servers/slapd/filterentry.c b/ldap/servers/slapd/filterentry.c
|
||||
index 2a7102828..4de4aa66e 100644
|
||||
--- a/ldap/servers/slapd/filterentry.c
|
||||
+++ b/ldap/servers/slapd/filterentry.c
|
||||
@@ -296,7 +296,27 @@ test_ava_filter(
|
||||
rc = -1;
|
||||
for (; a != NULL; a = a->a_next) {
|
||||
if (slapi_attr_type_cmp(ava->ava_type, a->a_type, SLAPI_TYPE_CMP_SUBTYPE) == 0) {
|
||||
- rc = plugin_call_syntax_filter_ava(a, ftype, ava);
|
||||
+ if ((ftype == LDAP_FILTER_EQUALITY) &&
|
||||
+ (slapi_attr_is_dn_syntax_type(a->a_type))) {
|
||||
+ /* This path is for a performance improvement */
|
||||
+
|
||||
+ /* In case of equality filter we can get benefit of the
|
||||
+ * sorted valuearray (from valueset).
|
||||
+ * This improvement is limited to DN syntax attributes for
|
||||
+ * which the sorted valueset was designed.
|
||||
+ */
|
||||
+ Slapi_Value *sval = NULL;
|
||||
+ sval = slapi_value_new_berval(&ava->ava_value);
|
||||
+ if (slapi_valueset_find((const Slapi_Attr *)a, &a->a_present_values, sval)) {
|
||||
+ rc = 0;
|
||||
+ }
|
||||
+ slapi_value_free(&sval);
|
||||
+ } else {
|
||||
+ /* When sorted valuearray optimization cannot be used
|
||||
+ * lets filter the value according to its syntax
|
||||
+ */
|
||||
+ rc = plugin_call_syntax_filter_ava(a, ftype, ava);
|
||||
+ }
|
||||
if (rc == 0) {
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
--
|
||||
2.45.2
|
||||
|
||||
Loading…
Reference in new issue