From 310410705b2c19a4fea9911a2e8bf0881522719b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?=C3=8D=C3=B1igo=20Huguet?= Date: Wed, 24 May 2023 15:00:39 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 132/142] wifi: rtw89: add use of pkt_list offload to debug entry MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2207499 commit 5da5ba7e6ec4f13c2abba8de3578a3c197925243 Author: Ping-Ke Shih Date: Mon Jan 23 14:53:58 2023 +0800 wifi: rtw89: add use of pkt_list offload to debug entry Driver can prepare pkt_list for firmware that only uses them to send out the packets in specific situations. To understand the usage of current status, and to check if there is leakage problem, dump bitmap and the indices used by certain function. An example looks like: map: ... pkt_ofld: 3f 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ... [SCAN 0]: 3 [SCAN 1]: 4 [SCAN 3]: 5 VIF [0] xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx ... pkt_ofld[GENERAL]: 0 1 2 Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230123065401.14174-4-pkshih@realtek.com Signed-off-by: Íñigo Huguet --- drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/debug.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/debug.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/debug.c index 6730eea930ece..0e0e1483c099b 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/debug.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/debug.c @@ -3354,6 +3354,31 @@ static void rtw89_dump_addr_cam(struct seq_file *m, } } +__printf(3, 4) +static void rtw89_dump_pkt_offload(struct seq_file *m, struct list_head *pkt_list, + const char *fmt, ...) +{ + struct rtw89_pktofld_info *info; + struct va_format vaf; + va_list args; + + if (list_empty(pkt_list)) + return; + + va_start(args, fmt); + vaf.va = &args; + vaf.fmt = fmt; + + seq_printf(m, "%pV", &vaf); + + va_end(args); + + list_for_each_entry(info, pkt_list, list) + seq_printf(m, "%d ", info->id); + + seq_puts(m, "\n"); +} + static void rtw89_vif_ids_get_iter(void *data, u8 *mac, struct ieee80211_vif *vif) { @@ -3364,6 +3389,7 @@ void rtw89_vif_ids_get_iter(void *data, u8 *mac, struct ieee80211_vif *vif) seq_printf(m, "VIF [%d] %pM\n", rtwvif->mac_id, rtwvif->mac_addr); seq_printf(m, "\tbssid_cam_idx=%u\n", bssid_cam->bssid_cam_idx); rtw89_dump_addr_cam(m, &rtwvif->addr_cam); + rtw89_dump_pkt_offload(m, &rtwvif->general_pkt_list, "\tpkt_ofld[GENERAL]: "); } static void rtw89_dump_ba_cam(struct seq_file *m, struct rtw89_sta *rtwsta) @@ -3402,6 +3428,7 @@ static int rtw89_debug_priv_stations_get(struct seq_file *m, void *v) struct rtw89_debugfs_priv *debugfs_priv = m->private; struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev = debugfs_priv->rtwdev; struct rtw89_cam_info *cam_info = &rtwdev->cam_info; + u8 idx; mutex_lock(&rtwdev->mutex); @@ -3416,6 +3443,15 @@ static int rtw89_debug_priv_stations_get(struct seq_file *m, void *v) cam_info->sec_cam_map); seq_printf(m, "\tba_cam: %*ph\n", (int)sizeof(cam_info->ba_cam_map), cam_info->ba_cam_map); + seq_printf(m, "\tpkt_ofld: %*ph\n", (int)sizeof(rtwdev->pkt_offload), + rtwdev->pkt_offload); + + for (idx = NL80211_BAND_2GHZ; idx < NUM_NL80211_BANDS; idx++) { + if (!(rtwdev->chip->support_bands & BIT(idx))) + continue; + rtw89_dump_pkt_offload(m, &rtwdev->scan_info.pkt_list[idx], + "\t\t[SCAN %u]: ", idx); + } ieee80211_iterate_active_interfaces_atomic(rtwdev->hw, IEEE80211_IFACE_ITER_NORMAL, rtw89_vif_ids_get_iter, m); -- 2.13.6